Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: a randomized controlled multicenter trial comparing laparo
نویسندگان
چکیده
1 Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Isala Zwolle, the Netherlands 2 Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Máxima Medisch Centrum Veldhoven, the Netherlands 3 Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gelre Ziekenhuizen Apeldoorn, the Netherlands 4 Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Spaarneziekenhuis Hoofddorp, the Netherlands 5 Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sint Lucas Andreas Ziekenhuis Amsterdam, the Netherlands 6 Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven, Belgium * corresponding author
منابع مشابه
Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: a multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy with vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy (LAVA-trial, study protocol)
BACKGROUND Pelvic organ prolapse is a common health problem: the lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse by the age of 85 years is 19%. Pelvic organ prolapse has significant negative effects on a woman's quality of life. Worldwide, vaginal hysterectomy is the leading treatment method for patients with symptomatic uterovaginal prolapse. Several studies have shown that vagin...
متن کاملTreatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: a randomized multicenter trial comparing sacrospinous fixation with vaginal hysterectomy (SAVE U trial)
BACKGROUND Pelvic organ prolapse is a common health problem, affecting up to 40% of parous women over 50 years old, with significant negative influence on quality of life. Vaginal hysterectomy is currently the leading treatment method for patients with symptomatic uterine prolapse. Several studies have shown that sacrospinous fixation in case of uterine prolapse is a safe and effective alternat...
متن کاملSacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial
OBJECTIVE To investigate whether uterus preserving vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy is non-inferior to vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse. DESIGN Multicentre randomised controlled non-blinded non-inferiority trial. SETTING 4 non-university teaching hospitals, the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS 208 healthy women with u...
متن کاملLaparoscopic inguinal ligament suspension versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common health problem. The lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for prolapse is 11%. POP significantly affects the effects on quality of life and activities of daily living. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) has been viewed as the gold standard treatment for women with POP who desire reconstructive surgery. However, LSC is associated with technical dif...
متن کاملLaparoscopic hysteropexy: the initial results of a uterine suspension procedure for uterovaginal prolapse.
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of laparoscopic hysteropexy, a surgical technique for the management of uterine prolapse, involving suspension of the uterus from the sacral promontory using bifurcated polypropylene mesh. DESIGN The investigation was designed as a prospective observational study (clinical audit). SETTING The study was undertaken at a tertiary refe...
متن کامل